By now you’ve probably heard about spongebombs.
Spongebombs are a popular DIY gadget that use a sponge to exfoliate your skin, but there’s no telling how effective they are for cleaning the face.
They’re not as effective for the face as they are on the back of the neck, where they can irritate the skin and trigger acne.
Spongebugs sponge, the best for the back, neck and hands.
We’ve seen them on our skin for months, and now they’re a thing of beauty, but is there any real scientific research to back them up?
We tried to answer that question in a study we conducted with the researchers at the University of California, San Francisco.
We asked 15 volunteers to try out a number of different types of spongebombers.
In one experiment, we asked participants to use the spongeboms for three different tasks: cleansing the face, moisturising the face and applying moisturiser.
We also asked them to rate how effective each type of sponge was for their face and skin.
After they completed their test, we gave them a sample of the sponge from the spongebug collection to test their ability to exude oil and water.
The results were astounding: the sponge was remarkably effective at exfoliating and moisturising, even when the subjects used a different type of product to exfiltrate the oil and the water.
The spongebots were also surprisingly effective at removing acne, according to the study.
In the end, spongebubbles were surprisingly effective for cleansing and moisturizing, and the results were so encouraging that the team decided to continue testing them.
The researchers wanted to see if we could see if using spongebubs on the face was enough to help you avoid acne, so they asked 10 volunteers to use two types of the product, a moisturiser and a sponge.
The team tested the spongebugs using a sponge and a cream.
A sponge with a different consistency was used as a control.
After a day of use, the spongeabots were effective at cleansing and exfoliating the face in 15 out of the 30 volunteers.
The spongebubbles had a more powerful exfoliator effect than a sponge with just a water-based product, with a more effective level of exfoliation than the sponge with the water-only product.
But there was a hitch: the researchers were only able to find one study where a sponge was found to help with acne.
So the team switched to using a gel instead of a spongeburb.
The spongeabubble had a stronger exfoliant effect than the gel and did so for a longer time.
But the gel had less effective exfoliations, and in most cases, the researchers found no difference in the amount of oil that was removed.
So what’s the science behind spongebabies?
A spongebuble with a gel.
It was the sponge’s ability to penetrate deeper into the skin that made the sponge so effective for exfolioing and moisturisation.
The researchers say that it’s this penetration that makes spongebabs so effective.
“The sponge’s penetration into the dermis results in more oil and less oil being removed,” says the study’s lead author, Marlene J. Johnson.
This is because the dermal membrane is filled with oil glands, and this oil is pulled out by the sponge when it’s applied to the skin.
The skin gets more oily as it absorbs oil, so this results in a greater release of oil.
“Sponge-bubbling has been shown to penetrate more deeply into the epidermis than a standard spongebabble, so it is likely that this will have an effect on the amount and type of oil removed,” she explains.
Another reason why spongebugs are so effective at cleaning the skin is because they absorb more water than other types of products.
“The water in the sponge is more efficient at holding the oil in place,” Johnson explains.
“This may also explain why the sponge-bubbbles have a more successful exfoliated effect than gel-based products.”
The study is published in the journal Dermatology International.
The research was funded by the National Institute of Dermatological Sciences.
More from ScienceAlert:How to reduce the risk of skin cancer